I still don't agree with it. Moving forward does not mean never looking back, no matter what Full Metal Alchemist says...Hopefully though, when we get up to a Fable where it takes place in the Old West(If it does), we'll have childhood back.

Why must we go without? Childhood is a fun part of the game, and helps new players figure out the controls before they're thrown into a crazy assed storyline. I mean, what will that tell people who buy only Fable 3? Who have never played the earlier two? Honestly?It just seems very odd, they you wish to remove one of the most important things of ...

Are you people that dense? What year is it in Fable? 1500, right? What was discovered in 1492? C'MON.. Aurora is going to be America. Geez. I figured that out when Theresa first said it.

Watched one of the interviews... I don't like that we don't get to start out a child. I really like that in games, where it shows WHERE you came from as opposed to just waking up in a dungeon somewhere. Or waking up in a bed, with someone telling you where you should go.

First off, I'd like to say, hello. For those who do not know me, I am Onasaki. I've been around these forums for about a few years now, watching the games through to development. I am known around here by some, and ignored by others. I remain mostly neutral on many of the facts/rumors that are brought up against or for the Fable series. And I ...

Maybe that IS the original from the Prophets? It's been 500 years, things change. And Lionhead doesn't owe us anything. If anything we owe -them- for giving us great games. So don't get your panties in a bunch.

Why do you want to give up your childhood!? >.> <.< Naw, it might be a glitch. You might need to reset.

I'm sure there's more then just two. We Got Albion, Samarkand, Aurora, Northern Reaches.. I'm sure there's plenty more. Fable just takes place before alot of it was discovered. I'm sure once we get the other Fable Games, Lionhead'll release an entire world map.

C'mon people, are you that dense? Aurora is America. Think about it, Fable 1 was like 1100 IE it would probably be around 1600 right now. Why? Because 1800 is closer to Old West, and America was already discovered, plus we had better guns during that time. Flintlocks appeared in the 1600s.The king would be something along the lines of King George, ...

Rickemosh:they should make people think that the dragonstompers gonna be there but then theres a note tht says''you didnt really think id leave such a valuable prize just lying around did you! ah well better luck next time-Reaver''That'd be hilarious.