|
|
Search
You searched for the word(s):
Showing page 1 of 187 (1,864 total posts)
< 1 second(s)
-
id love a more 'Ninja Gaiden' style of control. (and fighting! but thats not gonna happen in this genre )combos are the way forward (excuse me for playing no other games similar to ninja gaiden btw... i hate d may cry...)
-
spy46:ok lets try it this way.
we got the chasim, knothole, ranger and hals armor.
so thats 1 set that looks , one set that looks like a guy and the other 2 are ... what ever. knothole armour changes with your morality,id say it looks close to whatever you think a ''dark paladin'' looks like, if youre .personally, id only want to see 2 or ...
-
there is confirmed Co-op...Adus (is it?) said they were improving the coop, based on suggestiong from the community... or something like that...they certainly wouldnt be improving it, if its not going to be there.
-
spy46:well my point is, whats the point of having any if it makes no difference.
i like armor, but at the same time it had better do some thing, but we dont want a repeat of F1 plate armor = god hero.
hence IF they do put armor in, have like 5 different sets of each kind, that have a different effect VS different kinds of attacks ...
-
mikeboy92:my solution to armoUr
why fix whats not broken?fable 2's solution was just fine.(for those who still dont know... theres armour in dlc.)
-
A DECENT physique mesh.Ability to change skin colour. (was on pc fable only)4 player coop.LAVA CUBES!Modding tools? or a satifyingly big physique morph, considering modding and coop dont work well together.and finally... Great-maces! i loved the spiky iron bars!
-
PenguinSnuSnu:Second, a rapier is too much like a katana with it's speed, I think i would prefer some more unique weapons. Like a scythe, or a staff. rapiers are used like no other weapon?its pointy, not sharp.
-
thecookolsen:George W. is pissed!who cares what George W Bush thinks again? oh wait... thats right... he doesn't.
-
Trinitykill: garjian:so what your saying is...you hope fable 3 has fable 1 and 2 in it because fable 1 and 2 had fable 1 and 2 in it thus they were ?no Fable 3 should have the Fable 1 parts from Fable 2 and the fable 1 parts of fable 1 but some parts of fable 2 for fable 3, 1+2=3!wrong!3 = (2/2) + (1/1) + (2/2)3 = 1+1+1(edit: so... each thing is ...
-
yeah... it does that if you join during childhood...
1 ...
|
|