Welcome to Lionhead Community Sign in to Windows Live ID | Help

Search

You searched for the word(s):
Showing page 1 of 517 (5,165 total posts) < 1 second(s)
  • Re: Still trying to go platinum (4 years later)

    Sets and costumes are available elsewhere.
    Posted to The Movies™ and Stunts & Effects (Forum) by rjb2112 on November 8, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    00din: You're an idiot. No, really, you are.Darn you win, I can't argue with that kind of logic!
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on July 2, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    Kaosprophet: If you want to make an informed decision on the matter, you'll have to look at their explanations of why you didn't see what you (and they) think you saw. This is why I say their contradicting assertion raises the question, and not that it disproves your experience. What makes them credible? Well, in this case the fact that ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on July 2, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    Kaosprophet: rjb2112: Kaosprophet:If we're going to get semantic here: what is proof in the first place? First definition I find: evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth. So the concept of 'little proof' is an oxymoron at best by that definition.How about this one?To experience something first ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on July 1, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    Kaosprophet:If we're going to get semantic here: what is proof in the first place? First definition I find: evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth. So the concept of 'little proof' is an oxymoron at best by that definition.How about this one?To experience something first hand is proof itself ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on July 1, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    Kaosprophet: rjb2112: jazzx:But what about Einstein or Gallileo or Darwin - why are there no cults sprung up about these people? I'm not so sure, Darwinism in Britain at least is considered the norm when it comes to looking at mankinds beginnings. It is a theory of evolution which has become considered as fact Nitpick: Evolution itself is ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on July 1, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    jazzx:But what about Einstein or Gallileo or Darwin - why are there no cults sprung up about these people? I'm not so sure, Darwinism in Britain at least is considered the norm when it comes to looking at mankinds beginnings. It is a theory of evolution which has become considered as fact and has very ferverent following which is promoted by the ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on June 30, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    00din: rjb2112:Satan was indeed an angel of light and highly favoured by God. The reason that he could turn bad was because God allowed freewill, he wants to be loved freely, and not by force, being omnipotent he could use force, but then the love and worship would not be as valuable.No. The Lucifer myth does not even have biblical basis. Stating ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on June 29, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    LethargicMotivator:Why are people that worship old Egyptian gods, or Norse gods, or Greek gods treated like eccentric freaks when people who worship equally silly gods today can argue with a straight face that anybody who doesn't believe that the ''god'' that they in particular worship is going to go to an imaginary place of suffering where they ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on June 29, 2009
  • Re: Science or Religion?

    TheKaiser:I do often get the sense that those people who create a divide between ''Faith'' and ''Religion'' and then say, ''Well, religion is bad but faith is all lovely and everything,'' seem to have developed the definitions&nbsp;akin to, Religion = The Catholic Church Faith = Everything else dealing with the supernatural, especially those ...
    Posted to Off-Topic (Forum) by rjb2112 on June 28, 2009
1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »